Industry, Public Enterprise Reform and Regulatory Policy Industry, Public Enterprise Reform and Regulatory Policy
 Home
 Research Agenda
 Research
 Presentations
 Advisory Work
 Publications
 Research Staff
 Partners
 News and Events
 Other Sites of Interest

Applying Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) in Sri Lanka

 


Sri Lanka 's experience with rules-based regulatory systems is linked to the liberalization of the economy in 1977, and the privatization of state enterprises in the ensuing years. The stated objective of regulation, voiced by successive policy regimes, is to ensure that distributional concerns are addressed in the reform process, whilst creating an environment conducive to private investment flows.

In practice however, the policies governing the regulatory process have been ad hoc and based on short-term political interests. No effort has been made to either carry out an objective evaluation of proposed regulations, or consider alternative regulatory options; the need to carry out speedy competition and regulation reforms in order to satisfy donor conditionality is cited as justification for the failure to introduce impact assessment mechanisms. As a result, regulation in Sri Lanka has been less than optimal, with deficiencies apparent at every stage of the process, from policy formulation to the legal and institutional structures. Clearly, it is time to take stock of the reform process.

The objective of this project was to develop a template for RIA in Sri Lanka in collaboration with our research partners at the Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC), University of Manchester, and with an informal Working Group made up of key stakeholders from the policy and regulatory space, from the private sector, from the NGO community and from the media.

The short, medium and long term goals of the project were to:

  • Develop a concept paper for policy makers on “RIA: A Tool for Better Regulatory Governance in Sri Lanka ” based on the collaborative research we have done with our research partners and in the Working Group and on inputs from a public consultation process. (Short term)
  • Pilot test the RIA template developed for Sri Lanka in selected regulatory institutions or for selected pieces of legislation. (Medium term)
  • Fine tune a RIA process for Sri Lanka based on the findings from our pilot

 
Research Team:

Collaborating Team:

Malathy Knight-John, Shantha Jayasinghe, Amrit Rajapakse, Apsara Thurairetnam
Colin Kirkpatrick, David Parker (Centre on Regulation and Competition, University of Manchester)

Informal Working Group on RIA :
Sumathi Dharmawardena (State Counsel)
Susrutha Goonasekera (Professional, Centre for Poverty Analysis)
Chamath S. Goonewardena (Senior Professional, Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka)
H.W.K. Indrajith (Assistant Director - Sector Analysis, Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka)
Dr. Mahesha Ranasoma (Corporate Affairs Director, Shell Companies in Sri Lanka)
Dilshani Samaraweera (Journalist, Vanguard Management Services)

Funding :
Partner Site :
Publications:

Centre on Regulation and Competition, University of Manchester, U.K.
http://idpm.man.ac.uk/crc
“Regulatory Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka : The Bridges that have to be Crossed” (2004) by Malathy Knight-John, Shantha Jayasinghe, Andrew Perumal, Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper No.74, University of Manchester
(External Publication)

“Adopting Regulatory Impact Assessment in Sri Lanka: A Tool for better Regulatory Policy?” (2004) by Malathy Knight-John” in Law and Governance, 3, British Council, China
(External Publication)